What Happens If I Was Not Wearing a Seatbelt in a Car Accident?

The Seatbelt Defense

In most states, the fact that you were not wearing a seatbelt at the time of an accident can be raised by the defendant as evidence of comparative negligence. The argument is that your injuries were made worse by your failure to wear a seatbelt, and your recovery should be reduced accordingly.

How States Treat the Seatbelt Issue

State laws vary significantly. Some states allow the seatbelt defense to reduce damages by a fixed percentage. Others cap the reduction. A few states prohibit use of seatbelt non-use as evidence in civil cases. Understanding how your specific state handles this is important for evaluating your claim.

Effect on Your Recovery

The seatbelt defense affects the portion of your injuries attributable to the lack of restraint — not the entire claim. If you would have suffered serious injuries even with a seatbelt, or if certain injuries (like broken legs from pedal damage) were unrelated to seatbelt use, those damages may be unaffected.

What to Do

Not wearing a seatbelt complicates a claim but does not necessarily destroy it. An attorney can evaluate how the seatbelt defense applies in your state, what percentage reduction might be argued, and whether medical evidence supports distinguishing seatbelt-related from unrelated injuries.

Get Legal Help in Your City

• New York City, NY — Personal Injury
• Los Angeles, CA — Personal Injury
• Chicago, IL — Personal Injury

Browse all cities →